axapta - Static new and inheritance -


As preserved new method instead of establishing and using the new ... methods to reduce the lack of method overloading Recommend.
So I have explained the use of this method

But there is no legacy inherited. I had a look at the system sections hoping to find one so we have to define each sub-class stable construction and stable new methods .... Therefore, we lose some of the benefits of inheritance.

Better solution but what I saw does not really help me:
- Respect some new stable patterns and declare methods in subclasses - some examples of it without security Use New SalesFormLetter_Confirm Return (GetParmId: A "Square Factory", SalesFormLetter 

  Constant SalesFormLetter Creation (DocumentStatus Document, Boolean getParmId = true) {Switch (Document) {Case DocumentStatus :: Mother class as the kind of confirmation;); Case Document Stats :: Picklist List: Returns SalesFormLetter_PickingList :: Creation (getParmId); Case Document Stats :: Packing Slip: New SalesFormLetter_PackingSlip for return (getParmId); Case Document Stats :: Project Packing Slip: Returning to New Sales Form_PottingSlip Project (getParmId); Case Document Stats: Invoice: Return new SalesFormLetter_Invoice (getParmId); Case Document Stattus :: Project invoice: Return new SalesFormLetter_InvoiceProject (getParmId); Default: throw error (strfmt ("@ SYS19306", funka name ())); } Throw error (strfmt ("@ SYS19306", funka name ())); }   
 If there is a better solution, and therefore I am not thinking, then what would be the best of these?  
 
 
 
 A better solution to object on construction?  
 Well,  new  has to go somewhere, and put a lot of  new  in the client code is delicate and inflexible especially if the related sections Let's go with the class "factories".  
 Two options:  
     
  1.  
     Make  new  protect. Build one for each sub-class, call the builders of sub-classes and build a factory in the base class. But then any call to sub-class building method can call.   
  2.  
     Make the  new  do not create the creation of each sub-class in the public, building the factory in base class, new in subclasses. As the new can not be preserved because the base class does not descend from the sub-classroom.    
     Whether you go with 1 or 2, your choice is, you end up exposing sub-class constructor I personally prefer option 2 I am because it is the least problem.  
     Tip: Explain your object dependency using the arguments on  new . This will complicate your factories, but this is fine because it transfers the complexity of your client code Setter methods ( parm  methods) are bad, but required for  RunBase  Because it is necessary for the batch system.  
     Also see what they write.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Python SQLAlchemy：AttributeError: Neither 'Column' object nor 'Comparator' object has an attribute 'schema' -

I tried to create a new database in my project, but when I run the script, I get this error, I have another project, this type of definition worked before, but now it gets a single error. I am using Python 2.7.8 and the version of SQLAlchemy module is 0.9.8. By the way, using a project flask- SQLAlchemy, it works well, I'm confused. Traceback information is as follows: Traceback (most recent call final): File "D: / Projects / IOM / db_create.py", line 4, & lt; Module & gt; From the models the base file "D: \ Projects \ OO-IM \ models.py", in line 15, in the & lt; Module & gt; Column ( 'followed_id', int (), ForeignKey ( 'user.id')) file "C: \ Python27 \ lib \ site-packages \ SQLAlchemy \ SQL \ schema.py", line 369, __new__ schema = metadata. Schema file "C: \ Python27 \ lib \ site-packages \ SQLAlchemy \ SQL \ elements.py", line 662, AttributeError in __getattr__ key): Neither 'column' object nor ...
Read more

java - How not to audit a join table and related entities using Hibernate Envers? -

I use Eners to be hibernate to audit my institutions. I have an audit entity, Foo , which includes a list & lt; Bars & gt; However, I do not want to audit the bar institutions, in the form of properties, I have written that: @inti @edicated public class Foo {@JoinTable (name = "T_FOO_BAR", joinColumns = @JoinColumn (name = "FOO_ID"), inverseJoinColumns = @JoinColumn (Name = "BAR_ID")) @ManyToMany (Cascade = Persist) @ Indited (targetAuditMode = RelationTargetAuditMode.NOT_AUDITED ) Public listing & lt; Bars & gt; GetBars () {Return bars; }} Now, I want to retrieve an amendment of foo : AuditReader reader = AuditReaderFactory.get (GetEntityManager ()); FU modification = (FU) reader.CreativeTeA () .entensEtrevision (Foo Class, 42) .getSingleResult (); Unfortunately, when I want to retrieve all the data (i.e. when it loads lazy times ), error me ORA-00942: table or view is not present , because Tried to query this: Sel...
Read more

mongodb - CakePHP paginator ignoring order, but only for certain values -

While pagging my user model in kppp, I can sort with some values, but not others. For example, I can order results from created or email , for example, but username or reputation seems to come back order by arbitrary command for example with a list of users: $ this-> paginate = array ('condition' => array ( 'User.is_active' = & gt; true), 'border' => 24, 'order' => array ('User.created' => DESC)); Works as expected, but $ this - & gt; Paged = array ('conditions' = & gt; array (' user.isIactive '= & gt; true),' border '= & gt; 24,' command '= & gt; array (' user repeats' = ' & Gt; DESC ')); No, no. I first thought that this could be a database issue, but when I search the database directly, sorted as expected. Note: I am using Mangodebi with the Mongo DB plugin of Ichikawa for the KPPHP; Pagnetizing users are used to work properl...
Read more